This exactly. Absolutely no one in this thread actually knows what the older lady did. Yet we all judge her and laugh at her because the guy behind the camera is apparently “talented”. Talented at throwing out verbal abuse is all I can see. But hey, that’s ok, because we can just make up what we don’t see, and say that she was racist before the video even started to play
Nobody seems to notice that in this video, the senior citizen is backing up as the camera man advances. Watch camera man move forward towards her while screaming.
Commonsense tells us that this person is younger, fitter and physically imposing compared to this woman (she's fucking 80...)
But remember! This is all OK because "reasons"! Just TRY to fathom the reverse happening here.
PBS would release a 10-part docudrama hosted by a professor of diversity-science in a tweed suit with elbow patches about the ensuing riots that would happen once a video like this video went viral if the situation were reversed. But it's not so... "hAhA hE sO tAlEnTeD!".
Can you offer me proof that she “talked shit” to him. Please. If you can’t, why are you taking sides without actual proof? Skin color? Abusive words making you laugh better than the older lady walking away from him? Give me a good reason and I’ll show you the respect you want for your comment
black men have been lynched for less, don't give me this "reverse" bullshit.
White women have been lynched for less. Asian men have been lynched for less.
Because we are allowed to go back in time, right? That's how this works right?
When does reality start? I'm just curious because I would like to know how far back we're allowed to go when crying about our oppressions?
Does the trans-saharan slave-trade count? Am I allowed to cry about that?
Just give me some numbers on what times in history we're allowed to start at. Because who cares if it's 2021, right? I get the feeling your oppressions are timeless.
Edit: Your "dislike" button is not an argument. What year in chronological time are we allowed to go back to if we're talking about historical oppressions? I don't understand why this is such a controversial "thing"? I'm fine with us talking about black men being lynched, I would just like to know how far back in time we're allowed to go with this thing?
We both know you won't have the conversation because you can't have it.
Your emotional outbursts do not hold up to things like numbers and chronological time. You're incapable of actual discussion. It's not even what you really care about. Your only concern is furthering this identity-politics narrative.
I don't think you have ever had an original thought on the topic that you didn't just a parrot from some other equally sweaty virtue signaler.
You keep responding to me, why don't you just answer the question? Are you afraid?
This exactly. Absolutely no one in this thread actually knows what the older lady did. Yet we all judge her and laugh at her because the guy behind the camera is apparently “talented”. Talented at throwing out verbal abuse is all I can see. But hey, that’s ok, because we can just make up what we don’t see, and say that she was racist before the video even started to play
Nobody seems to notice that in this video, the senior citizen is backing up as the camera man advances. Watch camera man move forward towards her while screaming.
Commonsense tells us that this person is younger, fitter and physically imposing compared to this woman (she's fucking 80...)
But remember! This is all OK because "reasons"! Just TRY to fathom the reverse happening here.
PBS would release a 10-part docudrama hosted by a professor of diversity-science in a tweed suit with elbow patches about the ensuing riots that would happen once a video like this video went viral if the situation were reversed. But it's not so... "hAhA hE sO tAlEnTeD!".
dont talk shit then. being old doesn't give you free-range to be an asshole. if she can talk shit, he can talk shit.
black men have been lynched for less, don't give me this "reverse" bullshit.
Can you offer me proof that she “talked shit” to him. Please. If you can’t, why are you taking sides without actual proof? Skin color? Abusive words making you laugh better than the older lady walking away from him? Give me a good reason and I’ll show you the respect you want for your comment
lol, there is no universe where i want your respect. i never laughed at the lady - why lie?
i can she didn't defend herself or deny his accusations. i saw her give the lame response about white people being in Oakland now.
Did you not see her ask him to lower his voice and let her speak? HE WOULDNT LET HER DEFEND HERSELF!
...there sure seem to be more white people in Oakland now.
White women have been lynched for less. Asian men have been lynched for less.
Because we are allowed to go back in time, right? That's how this works right?
When does reality start? I'm just curious because I would like to know how far back we're allowed to go when crying about our oppressions?
Does the trans-saharan slave-trade count? Am I allowed to cry about that?
Just give me some numbers on what times in history we're allowed to start at. Because who cares if it's 2021, right? I get the feeling your oppressions are timeless.
Edit: Your "dislike" button is not an argument. What year in chronological time are we allowed to go back to if we're talking about historical oppressions? I don't understand why this is such a controversial "thing"? I'm fine with us talking about black men being lynched, I would just like to know how far back in time we're allowed to go with this thing?
i didn't downvote your rambling mess, but i get why someone would.
Is there a specific part of my comment that you disagree with? Or are you just having an emotional dump? Either way it's fine babe. Let it all out.
baby, babe. you and your post were lame. there, i let it out.
We both know you won't have the conversation because you can't have it.
Your emotional outbursts do not hold up to things like numbers and chronological time. You're incapable of actual discussion. It's not even what you really care about. Your only concern is furthering this identity-politics narrative.
I don't think you have ever had an original thought on the topic that you didn't just a parrot from some other equally sweaty virtue signaler.
You keep responding to me, why don't you just answer the question? Are you afraid?
fuck off.
Solid argument there chief. Your biological father would be so proud.
...
virtue signals? identity politics? YOU are the one who is just parroting.
i get it, black man was mean to old white lady and you feel the need to protect her.